THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CHABAD MOSHIACH GOD AND TRADITIONAL JUDAISM

Promotion of the deceased Chabad rebbe as a deity.

Are the disputes between the Chabad movement and traditional Orthodox Jewish movements disputes ONLY about whether the Moshiach (Messiah) can come from the dead, as many Chabad activists would have us believe?

In Jewish law, a מִין (min) is a term that refers to a person who maintains an atheist or idolatrous intellectual concept of God. According to Rambam, “minim” have no share in the World to Come.

In the Rambam’s comprehensive Jewish law code, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Teshuvah, Chapter Three, the Rambam lists five types of Jewish “minim”:

“(1) he who says that there is no God and no Omnipotence;

(2) he who says that there is an Omnipotence but that there are two or more such;

(3) he who says that there is One Lord; but that He is corporeal and has a form;

(4)Likewise one who says that He alone is not the First Cause and Creator of all;

(5) likewise he who worships a star, or planet, or any other as a mediator between him and the Lord of the universe; every one of these five is a min.”

Chabad “Meshichistin” are claiming that the deceased Chabad rebbe IS Moshiach now. The dispute with Chabad is certainly NOT about whether or not Moshiach MIGHT come from the dead. This claim is a “red herring” diversion.

Moshiach is not a god in human form. The authentic Moshiach is a living, human Jewish king in Israel, as the prophets of Israel, the Talmud, and the Rambam explained.

We have been seeing more and more books, websites, and Chabad missionaries that promote the deceased Chabad rebbe as a god-like messiah with supernatural qualities, and/or sites that portray him as an intermediary between Man and God.

  1. This video claims that the deceased Chabad rebbe is “atzmus”, IE the essence of God.

However, the video seems to misquote the Gemara when it refers to “nigleh” (revealed Torah) as being the source that a rebbe can (allegedly) be the essence of God. In fact that quote about Rashbi being the “face of God” seems to come from the Zohar (which is not considered “nigleh”), and it was denounced as blasphemy in the sefer “Mitpachat Seforim” by Rabbi Yaakov Emden zt”l.

2. A prominent Chabad rabbi claims that the Rebbe runs the world:

“The Rebbe runs the world and will save us from exile”

3. Ein Sof and Elokus are terms referring to Hashem.

This “rabbi” claims that the Rebbe is beyond our comprehension, the Rebbe is Ein Sof…the Rebbe is Elokus…:

“Should a Lubavitcher chassid read biographies written about the Rebbe?”

The conflict between Chabad and Orthodox Judaism is really a conflict over the fundamental principles of Judaism, including the 13 Ikkarim (principles of the Rambam).

Using its enormous influence and resources, Chabad promotion of a false moshiach-god threatens the destruction of monotheistic Judaism as we know it.

We must adamantly reject any missionaries, Jews or non-Jews, promoting false theologies.

We must re-assert authentic Torah principles, especially principles currently being blatantly violated:

• Hashem is not matter or energy

• We may not associate Hashem with any entity in this Universe.

• We may only serve, worship and glorify Hashem, not the entities created by Hashem.

• The real Moshiach must be a living Jewish king in Israel. A deceased rabbi cannot be Moshiach.

A few months ago a prominent Torah scholar in Israel told me that the Chabad movement is where Xtianity was 2000 yrs. ago.

This does not mean that every Chabadnik believes that the Chabad Rebbe is the messiah or a supernatural being. However, a non-Chabad Jew must be careful not to attend a Chabad synagogue where the Ikkarim are being violated.

All Jews should know and accept the 13 Ikkarim (principles) of Rambam.

13 Ikkarim of Rambam:

https://www.mesora.org/13principles.html

Everything is NOT from Hashem

Everything is NOT from Hashem

The Torah does Not claim “everything that happens is from Hashem”.

“וְעַתָּ֕ה הִנֵּ֛ה צַעֲקַ֥ת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל בָּ֣אָה אֵלָ֑י וְגַם־רָאִ֙יתִי֙ אֶת־הַלַּ֔חַץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר מִצְרַ֖יִם לֹחֲצִ֥ים אֹתָֽם׃ Now the cry of the Israelites has reached Me; moreover, I have seen how the Egyptians oppress them.” (Exodus 3:9)

“I am very angry with those nations that are at ease; for I was only angry a little, but they overdid the punishment.” (Zechariah 1:15)

On the Exodus verse, Ramban’s commentary explains that the Egyptians are excessively oppressing the Israelites, MORE than Hashem had actually decreed for the Israelites to be oppressed. Therefore Hashem has heard the cries of the Israelites, and Pharaoh and his people will be punished for their oppression of the Israelites. Sforno on that verse also explains that the Egyptians were oppressing the Israelites excessively. Sforno also cites the prophet Zechariah 1:15 that the nations oppressed the Jews excessively, more than Hashem had decreed.

Radak on Zechariah 1:15 explains that Hashem was only angry a little with Israel, and the nations did excessive evil to Israel. Radak also cited Isaiah 47:6 that the nations showed Israel no mercy.

All these citations allow us to respond to some of the deterministic Hareidi “preachers” nowadays that might want us to believe that all evil the Jews suffer is willed by Hashem, and/or the Jews always deserve any punishments meted out to them.

Rather, even when the Jews sin, Hashem did not give the non-Jews a blank check to oppress the Jews to an unlimited extent, so it follows that the nations who oppressed the Jews will be punished.

RECOMMENDED FOR CHABAD BAALEI TESHUVAH

We are presenting here a number of study materials we recommend for Chabad Baalei Teshuva or non-Chabad Baalei Teshuvah who are seeking understanding of fundamental principles of Judaism.

This chapter of the ancient and classical Chovos Halevavos book contains an excellent rational explanation of classical Torah theology.

Shaar HaYichud – Gate of Unity of G-d

This site contains a scholarly Torah based analysis of the serious problems with Chabad theology.

Identifying Chabad

A clear and scholarly explanation of the Rambam’s actual views on the messianic process, which conflict sharply with many erroneous explanations being presented by Chabad spokesmen on the messianic process.

Why the Messiah is Not Coming

The Replacement Theology & False Messianism of Chabad

A scholarly explanation of the problems with Chabad’s Tanya from the viewpoint of classical Torah theology.

Tanya and Heresy II

Pertinent Arguments Against False Messiahs

False Messiahs and their Opponents

An ex-Chabad Chassid describes the messianic fervor within Chabad and its correlation with an ancient false messiah.

After the Death of Chabads Messiah